Scott Mendelson

GET UPDATES FROM Scott Mendelson
 

Review: Dark Shadows

Posted: 05/10/2012 1:15 pm

Dark Shadows
2012
113 minutes
rated PG-13

Dark Shadows is a movie with pretty much nothing to say.  It uses its culture-clash and fish-out-of-water narrative not for any kind of social meaning or parable, but purely for cheap offhand laughs.  It is filled with wonderful actors who all look spectacular but have little or nothing to do.  The film tries to play around with mixing supernatural horror, cheap comedy and genuine soap opera theatrics, but nothing really meshes as it should.  It looks gorgeous as most Burton films do, the actors do what they can with very little, and the '70s soundtrack is filled with a mix of well-known classics and lesser-known hits.  Whether it is better or worse than Planet of the Apes or Alice In Wonderland is a moot point, it's simply yet another very bad Tim Burton film, his second in a row, in fact.  In short, Tim Burton's Dark Shadows can best be described in the same manner in which Alfred Hitchcock derogatorily referred to Ingrid Bergman: "So beautiful... so stupid."

The plot involves Barnabas Collins (Johnny Depp), a wealthy heir to a successful local fishing business, who was cursed after screwing then rejecting the housekeeper Angelique Bouchard (Eva Green) who was secretly a witch.  Turned into a vampire and locked in a coffin for 200 years, Barnabas is freed from his tomb and finds his way back to the now downtrodden Collins estate.  Awaiting him are several family members all going through their own personal problems, and Barnabas immediately sets out to restore the family business. But it will not be so easy, as the woman who cursed him still lives and now dominates the local industry, every bit as in love with the gentleman from 1690 as she was when she angrily cursed his family.  Fish-out-of-water comedy and light gothic supernatural horror ensues.

This is the part when I lose some of you, but I have absolutely zero knowledge of the original soap opera other than that it existed and television networks occasionally try to reboot it from time-to-time, that last attempt in 2004 caused WB to cancel Angel, so f** you Dark Shadows!  Anyway, after a visually striking but narratively repetitious prologue where Johnny Depp explains via voice-over the very onscreen events that are transpiring in front of us, the film shifts to 1972 for an opening credits sequence framed by a long bus trip and scored to Moody Blues' "Nights in White Satin."  The opening credits sequence is sadly the best scene in the film, as it creates a sense of mystery and dread that the film never even attempts to deliver on.  Our entry character is Victoria Winters (Bella Heathcote), a young unassuming woman who has traveled to answer a newspaper ad for a governess for the family's troubled son David (Gulliver McGrath).  Through her eyes we meet the rest of the clan, including David's useless father (Johnny Miller), the grouchy and sarcastic older daughter (an absolutely wasted Chloe Moretz, save for a few quick laughs), and the family matriarch (Michelle Pfeiffer).  Once Barnabas returns, the focus of the picture switches from our audience surrogate to yet another audience surrogate, albeit one who is an occasionally murderous vampire.

If I told you that a new dark comedy was coming out starring Johnny Depp, Eva Green, Michelle Pheiffer, Helena Bonham Carter, Chloe Moretz, Jackie Earle Haley and Johnny Lee Miller, you'd probably think "Well, even if the film isn't very good, I suppose it will be an acting treat!".  You would be wrong. Burton and company are going for a somewhat arch and stylized performance style most associated with soap operas, but that creative choice drains the film of anything approaching interesting performances or engaging characters (Eva Green gives it her all but is felled by a strained American accent).  The film spends much of its first two acts playing out like a genuine soap opera, as Depp and either Pfeiffer or Green stand around and discuss the plot and recap everything that's come before. But at least those first two acts contain a token amount of narrative coherency.  The third act spirals completely out of control with climactic events that both involve pointless special effects work and about three different kinds of deus ex machina.  The film's climax both leaves most of its characters figuratively and literary stranded, not so much setting up a sequel as arbitrarily ending the film because the two hour mark is close at hand.

The film fails to build any kind of emotional investment in any of its characters.  We are technically supposed to root for Barnabas to defeat the machinations of Green's Angelique, but other than the evil she perpetrates in the prologue, all she really does over the next 200 years is bring economic stability and prosperity to the town of Collinswood.  Barnabas only achieves success through trickery and kills quite a few completely innocent people in his periodic blood-lust.  The film acknowledges this contradiction, but basically asks us to cheer the destruction of a strong/successful businesswoman in order to bring economic fortune to a family that basically spent 200 years in near-poverty because they didn't know where the family fortune was hidden.  Burton hammers home a pro-family values message ("There is no greater wealth than family") while somewhat mocking that cliche with an amusing third-act turn.  It can be argued that Dark Shadows deserves credit for openly flaunting the immorality of its lead characters and not putting them on a pedestal purely for the sake of audience sympathy.  But the lack of depth to the supporting characters, the lack of story momentum, and the poor attempts at comedy (Alice Cooper cameo-ing and not doing anything funny is not funny) leaves the film with nothing to engage the viewer.

The creepy gender undertones at play also annoy, as the dynamic between would-be love interest Bella Heathcote (comely, quiet, waiting for her suitor to call) vs Eva Green (bracing, sexually confident, in complete authority) could not be more virgin/whore if they tried.  If I may speak pruriently, Eva Green looks absolutely stunning in this picture (Eva Green + power suit = win), in fact there is a treasure trove of beautiful actresses looking striking throughout the picture (Green, Heathcote, Moretz, Helena Bonham Carter, etc). The girls (or gay men) get no such favors, which is amusing as a very not-handsome Johnny Depp is constantly hit on by several female characters throughout.  What entertainment value the film does possess is in its atmospheric production design and a few moments of successful comedy (a conversation about dating between Moretz and Depp elicits laughs, as does a bit of exposition set to ill-timed piano music).  The picture, however visually striking (and pruriently appealing), is lacking in narrative thrust and amazingly inconsistent in tone.

Dark Shadows is a film that has no idea what it wants to be.  It alternates between C-level fish-out-of-water comedy and supernatural horror, while occasionally playing in a genuine soap opera sandbox. It is nice to see a big-scale summer blockbuster packed to the gills with female characters (this film passes the Bechdel Test in the first reel), but I just wish so many of its actresses weren't wasted. Aside from Pfeiffer, Green, and arguably Moretz (she's too young/hungry to get lazy yet), the entire cast of the film mostly performs their scenes in the above-noted 'arch soap opera' styling that renders the film patently artificial. I have no idea what Tim Burton was trying to achieve with Dark Shadows, nor do I have much insight into what the movie is 'about.'  Whether or not it's Burton's worst film is less important than the fact that, with seemingly free rein and complete artistic freedom, he's made a film this bad.

For an essay on Tim Burton fandom, an essay on the legacy of Burton's Planet of the Apes, and a review of Alice In Wonderland, click accordingly.

 

Follow Scott Mendelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottMendelson

FOLLOW MOVIEFONE
'FONE FINDS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Southrnbelle
HILLARY 2016!!!
12:52 PM on 05/11/2012
I ran home from school everyday to watch Barnabas and friends in the 1960s.

I consider this film to be a travesty.

How could Burton defile this beloved chapter of American pop culture so badly?

Very disappointed.
08:52 PM on 05/14/2012
As opposed to defiling this beloved chapter of American pop history so well? Actually, persuing the linguistic logic of your double negative to its logical conclusion, if he defiled it badly, then he did a poor job of defiling it and actually made a good movie, whereas if he did a really good job of defiling it then it would be very deeply defiled.

Actually what he did was to make a movie. The "beloved chapter of American Pop History" is unchanged. You can buy the entire series on DVD (For about $500) all undefiled and unsullied, or stream it on Netflix. Get over yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:11 AM on 05/11/2012
The review for this are pretty rough and the Avengers is out and will steam roll over this. bad timing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yorkie
07:46 AM on 05/11/2012
A very different director was needed to direct this film....much could be made to celebrate the series that was of it's mid/late 60's era,,, mysterious, scary, campy,,clever characters all at the same time...not too dark, yet memorable scenes...
06:23 AM on 05/11/2012
Classic example of a tautology: "...yet another very bad Tim Burton film..."
11:36 PM on 05/10/2012
Well, I am thouroughly looking foward to seeing this new version. So many fans have so many differing opinions about the original series, the follow up movies and the eventual series re-do, that to try to please eveyone with this would be folly at best. I LIKE the fact that Burton decided to take an irrevent tack. After all, we ARE talking about a grand old mansion, with a really dysfunctional family in the hippie heyday of 1972. Damn right it is gonna end up funny somehow, so Burton decided to roll with it. And here's ode to Jonathan Frid who has a small cameo in the film, and passed away April 13, 2012 at the age of 87.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
yeswecanjane
Top 2% should create more jobs or pay more
11:30 PM on 05/10/2012
Some people just enjoy Burton/Depp Movies:) They are goofy and fun for the whole family.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson
Film critic/pundit for Mendelson's Memos, Valley S
10:02 AM on 05/11/2012
I grew up on Burton/Depp movies. I saw Ed Wood in a theater on opening night. Dark Shadows is, alas, no Ed Wood.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
10:46 PM on 05/10/2012
"So beautiful... so stupid."

MCP: Why did God make women so beautiful and so stupid.
Woman: Well he made us beautiful so you would like us, and he made us stupid so we would like you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Southrnbelle
HILLARY 2016!!!
12:53 PM on 05/11/2012
F&F!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfs5541
09:40 PM on 05/10/2012
The film might "work" since not many folks watched the series.
10:50 PM on 05/10/2012
Excuse me? Lots and lots of people watched the series. It was a highly popular cult series. I never watched it, but it's fans are legion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Southrnbelle
HILLARY 2016!!!
12:55 PM on 05/11/2012
Millions!!!!

It was the hottest show on TV in the late 1960s.

I am proud to say I was one of them.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson
Film critic/pundit for Mendelson's Memos, Valley S
10:03 AM on 05/11/2012
I have no idea how fans of the series will react, but it will be interesting to watch.
09:25 PM on 05/10/2012
I actually read your entire diatribe on Dark Shadows. Frankly, you basically said everything in the first paragraph - though I really take issue with that gratuitous Hitchcock quote about Ingrid Bergman. I will grant you that a movie's story should be able to stand on its own merit and not require the audience to have prior "insider's" knowledge of the schtick. And style is never a substitute for substance. However, if you're going to do a critique, I really suggest you watch some of the old episodes - per usual soap opera it takes lots of exposition episodes to get to the "good ones", but the good ones were the ones where Joan Bennet, and the other actors who did Angelique, Victoria Winters and Barnabas were certainly enthralling when I watched it after school. Barnabas was evil and sexy at the same time, Victoria was the perfect Gothic governess heroine and Angelique had the most amazing eyes. It was great - LOL.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:11 PM on 05/10/2012
I watched the original series for the unintentional laughs it provided. It was awful. Let it go, middle-aged fanboys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sara Williams
08:38 PM on 05/10/2012
Ugh. My mother named me for a character on this show, and I've sort have been proud of that weird but not obvious distinction. This remake is gross, though.

Dark Shadows was a bit funny in how seriously it took itself; it was a soap opera, basically. It shouldn't be a happy, comedic children's movie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ESerafina42
Abandoned by wolves, raised by Republicans.
11:25 PM on 05/10/2012
Are you talking about the movie or the TV show? I never thought the show took itself too seriously, which was a large part of its charm, as well as the reason why the revivals have tended to fail. It's kind of hard to take yourself seriously when you have to just recover and keep going when you flub your lines, though that may have been SOP for soaps back then.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
07:23 PM on 05/10/2012
This was akin to reading some recent Star Trek critics, who were too young to have seen TOS. I guess the viewpoint is apropos for younger audiences who are unfamiliar with the source material.

Or, I'm just getting old. :-)
photo
25yep
If you have no sense of humor, why are you here?
06:50 PM on 05/10/2012
Hey, Mendelson, thanks for the review but honestly, who cares what you think? It's just your opinion. You may get paid for it, big deal, a million other people on the net will be giving their own take on the movie, you're really no different than them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:09 PM on 05/10/2012
He writes for a backwater website; HP picks him up for free. If it weren't for the free tickets he gets to passes he wouldn't see very many films on his salary.
10:51 PM on 05/10/2012
He certainly wasn't not paid by the Huff Po. However, if you don't care about his opinion, why did you read the review?
photo
25yep
If you have no sense of humor, why are you here?
12:17 AM on 05/11/2012
Who says I did?
photo
25yep
If you have no sense of humor, why are you here?
09:46 PM on 05/12/2012
Sorry, Junior, it's Saturday night, have a date with my real (not imaginary, like, well, you know who's) girlfriend, actually, now my wife. The evening has more in store for me, but you and Flubly feel free to continue the discourse about the value of movie critics, I'm sure it will be fascinating and you'll both titter and tee hee all night long. Signing off.
photo
Issaquah79
Look mom no head!
06:33 PM on 05/10/2012
The previews have this film looking fairly terrible. I am a big fan of the tv series and was excited to hear about this film but Tim Burton can make really terrible movies and this is probably one them. I'll pass.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony Dodd
Pssst THE GOP IS OVER
05:50 PM on 05/10/2012
All that matters is if the movie LOOKS good.