Scott Mendelson

GET UPDATES FROM Scott Mendelson
 

"Girl Power" Animated Films Used to Be No Big Deal

Posted: 02/24/2012 5:55 pm

I don't generally watch clips, let alone post them, for upcoming films.  I somewhat dislike the practice of releasing full-blown scenes of upcoming films, as it's purely spoiler material, plain and simple.  But I will make an exception, as posting the above clip gives me the opportunity to rant about something that came to mind about a month ago while I was on a Disney Cruise with the wife and kids. Point being, there will be any number of essays written over the next few months about how Pixar's Brave is some kind of groundbreaking picture because it has a female lead, a warrior princess no less.  But its story, which seems to involve a young girl who rebels against her family's expectations regarding his place in life as a girl in 1300s (?) Scotland (see the teaser and the trailer HERE and HERE).  That's fine.  The film looks gorgeous and I'm a sucker for Scottish music (Patrick Doyle is handling the scoring duties). Alas, I think it's frankly downright regressive that we view this film as a feminist breakthrough.  Quite simply, Disney released an animated film back in 1998 starring a female protagonist who rebelled against society's expectations of her.  Mulan was as much a feminist fable as Brave is selling itself as, and there wasn't nearly as much huffing-and-puffing about it at the time.

Mulan is neither one of the great Disney animated features nor one of the lesser ones.  It's a rock-solid cartoon, arguably stronger in  its first third when it's centered on family drama than its later acts which are somewhat dominated by comic supporting characters (Eddie Murphy's dragon and Mulan's fellow soldiers).  And, as much as I like Miguel Ferrer, I have never been able to buy his soft-spoken vocals coming out of a massive and physically imposing Hun leader.  But come what may, it is a straight-ahead action picture (with a decent-sized body count to boot) that not only stars a female warrior but explicitly deals with the kind of 'girls can do what boys can' messaging that the marketing materials for Brave seem to be emphasizing.  Whether or not Brave will be better or worse than Mulan is beside the point.  When Mulan was released in mid-June of 1998, its female-centric action story was basically treated as 'no big deal,' because at the time it somewhat was.

Yes, it was unusual to see a female Disney character leading the charge into battle and even killing people as opposed to helping from the sidelines, but the idea of a big-budget cartoon featuring a female was pretty standard in the 1990s.  Even aside from Beauty and the Beast and The Little Mermaid, we had Pocahontas in 1995, which featured a headstrong Native American princess who prevented war through a show of moral force. The first big strike against Disney's monopoly was Fox's Anastasia in late 1997, which also featured a female lead who engaged in action as well as romance (while both are better films, its amusing to see how The Princess and the Frog and Tangled both take bits and pieces from that now-mostly forgotten picture).  Going all the way up to 2002, with Lilo and Stich, it was just as likely that a major animated film would feature a female protagonist as a male lead.  It wasn't until the Pixar mold basically took over Disney around 2004  and Shrek solidified animated films as four-quadrant event films that we started to see a run of 'no girls allowed' animated films.


That's not a swipe at Pixar or Dreamworks, per se.  The Incredibles, Up, and Toy Story 3 were all my favorite films of their respective years, while Toy Story 2 was second only to The Sixth Sense in 1999 (and it's so secret Kung Fu Panda 2 was my favorite film of last year).  I would argue that Pixar has worthwhile female supporting characters (Elastagirl, Violet, Dory, Jesse, Atta) in their male-centric narratives (I especially like how the climax of A Bug's Life involves Hopper kidnapping Flik with Atta flying off to the rescue).  But at the end of the day, the last decade has not been a good time for female-centric animated films, to the point where Dreamworks' Monsters Vs. Aliens was actually considered 'a big deal' in 2009 because it starred Reese Witherspoon in a somewhat feminist narrative.  Yes, the decade closed and a new one opened with The Princess and the Frog and Tangled. but The Princess and the Frog's gender-demos was blamed for its mere $225 million worldwide take which caused Tangled to be infamously marketed as a boy-friendly adventure. Plus, Tangled marked the official end of fairy tale adaptations even as it out-grossed every prior non-Pixar Disney toon worldwide other than The Lion King.

Even in the post-Twilight age where The Hunger Games is set to open on a massive scale, female-centric franchise pictures are still considered a risky bet, arguably riskier than they were considered just 15 years ago.  Hence, the seemingly progressive feminist narrative of Brave isn't actually a step forward, but actually a step back, but back to a time when a movie like Brave wouldn't have raised eyebrows in the first place.

 

Follow Scott Mendelson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ScottMendelson

FOLLOW CANADA LIVING
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
04:24 PM on 02/25/2012
You've missed the films of Hayaki Miyazawa which all have major female characters of strength and intelligence, and are often the plot pivot and the major character. "Nausicaa", "Spirited Away" which won the academy award for best animated film "The Cat Returns," "Kiki's Delivery Service" "My Neighbor Totoro" "Castle in the Sky" are all led by girls or women. His early "Castle of Cagliostro","Princess Mononoke", "Howl's Moving Castle" and "Ponyo" have women who carry at least half the plot as does "Porco Rosso." I don't know any of his films that don't.
-swift
Can you put your country before your party?
12:05 PM on 02/26/2012
True, but his films, even with Disney repackaging them, don't get the advertising dollars and press that true Disney features and Pixar features get.

By the way, it's Hayao Miyazaki. And his films are masterpieces. If you've never seen one, check them out.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
01:03 PM on 02/26/2012
Hayao Miyazaki Boy is MY face red!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson
Film critic/pundit for Mendelson's Memos, Valley S
05:14 PM on 02/26/2012
I was focusing on the trend in American animated features...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:12 AM on 02/25/2012
Girl power? Eww ... that's so 90s!
photo
lostinseganet
You need good D"Defence"? well so do I
04:44 PM on 02/26/2012
What if they have some emergency black power? You know just in case? :)
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
08:32 AM on 02/25/2012
Why does everybody automatically assume that any sort of action story with a female lead character is automatically a Girl Power thing?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson
Film critic/pundit for Mendelson's Memos, Valley S
11:11 AM on 02/25/2012
Honestly? It was a headline thing, as 'girl power' (a phrase I generally dislike) was shorter/more concise than 'Female-centric' or 'Animated films starring a female lead'. I agree with you and have argued that one of the reasons so many turned on SUCKER PUNCH is because they thought it was trying to fit into said category when it was merely commentary on the phrase's somewhat false optimism.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:06 PM on 02/25/2012
Sucker Punch failed because it was an incoherent morass of fanboy tropes all shoved into a single pet project.
03:47 AM on 02/25/2012
It's OK in some animated settings, but in live action movies it's just silly. Sorry, women are not physically tough. Sure, a very few are tougher than the majority of men, but there isn't a woman in the world who could stand toe to toe with a mid-level professional lightweight male boxer, MMC fighter, etc...

So movies where women are jumping around kicking a** just come off as silly _except_ in a few cases such as superhero movies (they're not human, so different rules).
12:34 PM on 02/25/2012
There are very few men that can stand toe to toe with a mid-level professional lightweight male boxer, MMC fighter, etc., either. So what's your point?

Movies where men are jumping around kicking a** come off a silly as well. Most men aren't trained to fight like you see in the movies. Street brawls are usually just embarrassing displays of flailing.
09:42 AM on 02/26/2012
Rule one of girl fight - never ever fight fair. You are not looking to gain a reputation as a great boxer, you are looking to maim - use keys, pens/pencils, bottles, furniture, toxic chemicals, anything that can be used to really hurt someone. You probably won't end up killing/maiming your opponent, but you will cause real damage, which is the point.

For lack of a better phrase, the "killer instinct" is in your head, not your body.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miriam Breslauer
03:26 AM on 02/25/2012
I loved Mulan. I would have preferred it without Eddie Murphy, but otherwise it was a great film. It is my favorite Disney movie because she ISN'T a Princess and doesn't become a Princess. She is a heroine in her own right and respected as such.

I am sick of the recent patern where all young girls in stories are Rich and/or Princesses (or will become one). Even worse, they eventually all just become accessories for the male lead.
06:22 PM on 02/25/2012
I've seen her marketed as a princess from time to time, though. I haven't seen the animated version, but in the original Chinese story I believe she was a general's daughter.
12:15 AM on 02/25/2012
That's one of the reasons why I really like the Disney Channel and even Nick. They seem to be almost the only media out there that's totally gender-equal (or sometimes female-centric). I've never been a fan of Pixar, but coincidentally I've recently seen some non-Pixar Disney animated movies that I like (the Tinkerbell movies and maybe Bolt).
08:24 PM on 02/24/2012
I think it's odd that the quest for female and feminine equality became about women engaging in violent war like behavior under the pretense of being "strong". I don't think we need to see women beating people up to respect them as intelligent, competent people. We don't judge our leaders by how well they would fair in a fist fight. Heck FDR could barely stand up and he was a beloved president with 3 terms. I liked when feminism promoted respect for femininity. A society without feminine qualities can be brutal, mean spirited, unforgiving, and cold. Kind of like America today.
02:45 AM on 02/25/2012
The quest for female equality is not focused on engaging in physical confrontation or war like behavior as you suggest. If a woman chooses to be a warrior, however, that is her choice and it should absolutely be respected and not infringed upon. Our women soldiers are no less intelligent, competent, or feminine because they choose to join the military.
06:00 AM on 02/25/2012
I was talking about movies. The strong women went from just being assertive and in charge to a 100 pound women who beats up 250 pound men.

Please no more condescending feminist lectures, as if you are breaking new ground in social consciousness instead repeating stuff from a half century ago.

Not even controversial except the indelibility of feminine characteristics. Doing boyish things makes you boyish. You can dress girly but you won't act girly. A true feminine will out shine a part timer.

We are human and our activities in life alter our character. This is why people get PTSD after really seeing awful things.

Even for males, regular child care will cause their testosterone levels to drop.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:00 PM on 02/26/2012
Equality! Great statement. In the military, that would mean equal standards to men. They have never yet been held to equal standards. The PT requirements are starkly different for men and women in the military, as are accommodations in the field for women and physical expectations. Add to that the fact that females can (and do, in my experience) get pregnant and thus taken out of the combat zone, with no replacement, and you have created a personnel strength reliability problem. In practice, women in the military have not even come close to being treated equally. The pregnancy factor makes them extremely unequal and complicated. Would be the same problem if men could become pregnant (or something effectively similar). And this is all ignored. The quest for female equality seems to play out in a very unequal sense.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Mendelson
Film critic/pundit for Mendelson's Memos, Valley S
05:15 PM on 02/26/2012
I happen to agree with you, which is why I made a point to reference Pocahontas. It's not one of the better Disney cartoons, but it does have a female hero who prevents war rather than engages in it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
08:23 PM on 02/24/2012
The trophe that's overworked is the one in which (early in the picture) the female lead shows an ability to defend herself....but in the last reel or two, the man comes to her rescue. It would be good for girls to see stories that show a woman who's capable of rescuing herself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miriam Breslauer
03:22 AM on 02/25/2012
I highly recommend "Ever After" with Drew Barrymore for a great story where the female lead can take care of herself.
07:24 AM on 02/25/2012
Yes a macho women never needs help. I remember when men were being told to stop being so macho and let someone help you, and I am sure you also remember it. The guy would try and fix something and spend a really long time or try and assemble it without instructions but not look to them out of foolish pride. Your comment about women not wanting to be rescued sounds like that same kind of macho attitude, but coming from women trying to get high on pride.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
06:44 PM on 02/25/2012
You missed my point by several light years. The article was about motion pictures and the portrayal of women in them, not about real life. My point was that it might be good, for girls to see a protaganist who is capable of fending for herself. You may prefer a 1950s portrayal of gender roles; some do. Your use of the adjective 'macho' might indicate that you believe self-sufficency to be a masculine trait. Like many others, I see it as a trait both sexes can and should possess.
photo
Issaquah79
Look mom no head!
07:25 PM on 02/24/2012
I think we have had enough movies/characters like this. Of course women are interested in what are traditionally considered masculine persuits and that should be encouraged however, feminism is not really about being one of the boys. I find the casting off of feminity in favor of manly endeavors a disturbing trend in these kids movies aimed at young girls. It only reaffirms the feminine aspect as being inadequate and unwanted and masculinity as the ideal. This is bad for everyone. The feminine must be celebrated and fully explored. It's not about being a princess and pretty clothes though there is nothing wrong with either. We must encourage both boys and girls to be open to many different experiences and interests. This girl power thing is getting to be very one-note.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ozmas mirror
Sadly, accidental rudeness occurs alarmingly often
07:38 PM on 02/24/2012
No, we have not had enough.