Mike Ryan

GET UPDATES FROM Mike Ryan
 

Amazing Spider-Man New Footage: 7 Things We Learned

Posted: 02/ 6/2012 4:34 pm

This afternoon, Sony previewed new footage from the you're-anticipating-it-more-than-you-think-you-are reboot of the Spider-Man franchise, "The Amazing Spider-Man." The event was simulcast in four cities -- New York, Los Angeles, London and Rio de Janiero -- but only the post-Super Bowl crowd in the Big Apple was treated to an in-person visit by star Andrew Garfield. Here are seven things we learned from viewing approximately 4 percent of The Amazing Spider-Man.

Andrew Garfield is not Daniel Radcliffe.

When Garfield was introduced to the New York crowd, a heckler shouted, "Daniel Radcliffe!" A visibly confused Garfield fired back, "Daniel Radcliffe? What? No!" before his microphone was temporarily cut off. But it's true: Andrew Garfield has officially confirmed that he is not Daniel Radcliffe.

Spider-Man's story has never been told before.

In Los Angeles, director Marc Webb was introduced as "the man who will bring you the untold story of Spider-Man." OK? Well, except for those three other movies that all came out within the last 10 years. To be fair: this story delves into what happened to Peter Parker's parents. So I know what they mean, but it's slightly ... odd. Speaking of!

The three Spider-Man movies that you've already seen no longer exist.

There's an obvious attempt by everyone involved to distance themselves from the three prior movies (two of which you liked). Webb said his Spider-Man is more "realistic" and "naturalistic" then what we've seen before. In other words, forget those other movies that you liked. Speaking of!!!

The new Spider-Man may actually make you forget about the three prior films.

OK, look, this remains to be seen. And "Spider-Man 2" is still one of the best superhero movies ever made. But, I have to admit, the footage from the new film is pretty great. Whereas Tobey Maguire played Peter as a nerdy peon, Garfield captures the character's smart-ass charm. In one scene, a car thief pulls a knife on Spider-Man, who responds with a sarcastic "Oh, no, not a knife!" -- and then faux-sneezes spider webs all over the guy. Honestly, having seen footage from both "The Avengers" and "The Amazing Spider-Man," I think people will not like the former quite as much as they think they will, and will like the latter more than they expect to.

Emma Stone was not pleased with the question that she was asked.

Each star took a "fan question," (which were pre-approved and might not have been actual fan questions). Emma Stone, who appeared at the Rio event, was asked, "How is Gwen Stacey different than Mary Jane Watson?" Stone, who plays Gwen Stacy in the new movie, did not attempt to hide her disdain for that question. I'm not sure why, but I think she thought it was too boring. (Her answer had something to do with "yin" and "yang.")

Peter Parker masturbates to Gwen Stacey in his bedroom.

In one of the clips that were shown in full, Peter's is confronted at school by his uncle (Martin Sheen) after getting into a scrap with a school bully named Flash Thompson. During their discussion, Gwen Stacey walks by and Uncle Ben takes the opportunity to point out, to Stacey, that Peter has photos of Gwen on his computer. "Touching" jokes soon follow.

Rio de Janeiro is not really that excited for a new Spider-Man movie.

While the crowds in New York, Los Angeles and London seemed genuinely enthused about the footage (New York especially -- but that may be a Super Bowl afterglow thing), the audience in Rio might as well have been watching the final scene of "Schindler's List." It got so bad that the New York crowed started to openly mock the Rio crowd.

Mike Ryan is the senior writer for Moviefone. He has written for Wired Magazine, VanityFair.com, GQ.com, New York Magazine and Movieline. He likes Star Wars a lot. You can contact Mike Ryan directly on Twitter

 
'FONE FINDS
This afternoon, Sony previewed new footage from the you're-anticipating-it-more-than-you-think-you-are reboot of the Spider-Man franchise, "The Amazing Spider-Man." The event was simulcast in four c...
This afternoon, Sony previewed new footage from the you're-anticipating-it-more-than-you-think-you-are reboot of the Spider-Man franchise, "The Amazing Spider-Man." The event was simulcast in four c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
12:25 PM on 02/08/2012
Y'know, the movie might turn out to be good but, to use the old phrase, "Been there, done that". My interest in seeing even a well made Spiderman movie is pretty darned low.
07:02 AM on 02/08/2012
8th thing we learnt.....?

Andrew Garfield makes for the 'weediest' looking superhero I have ever seen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdub1991
Seek first to understand, then to be understood
06:51 PM on 02/07/2012
I saw the latest and trailer and--while I hate to admit it--this looks like it might not be half bad. And this from someone who hasn't cared much for Spider-Man since the days of Ditko.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
04:35 PM on 02/07/2012
Well I think it looks really good. With this new suit design, I think they're trying too hard to distance themselves from the other movies. Raimi's trilogy had its flaws, but the suit was just about perfect.

My only big complaint is how they're constantly flinging things at the camera just to show off the 3D. I'm not one of these people who is rigidly anti-3D. I think as an alternative, it's fine. But when 3D starts to influence the content of a movie, I have to draw the line. Not acceptable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ethiopia1a
The COMMA Sutra,,,,making grammar sexy since 1875
01:52 PM on 02/07/2012
Sometimes, I crawl under my bed and pretend I'm a carrot!!!
01:39 PM on 02/07/2012
More "realistic" and "naturalistic?" Its a movie about a guy who gets bit by a radioactive spider, crawls on walls and spins webs! Realistic and naturalistic are two words that should never appear in the conversation.
07:36 PM on 02/07/2012
Nolans Batman-films is more realistic than the previous versions. So yes it works fine
11:40 AM on 02/07/2012
Who liked the other three movies? They were trash, hence the reboot with more quality parts involved (actors, director, writers, choice of canon to use).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
04:37 PM on 02/07/2012
They weren't trash. Well, not all of them.

The first one was alright. The second one was fantastic, and is still one of my favorite comic book movies. The third one, yeah, that was trash.
04:47 PM on 02/07/2012
Have you watched them recently? So campy and corny. I bet your opinion changes if you re-watch.
09:45 AM on 02/07/2012
Why reboot a franchise that didn't need rebooting and was just in theaters a few years ago? Simple. Because its cheaper. Rather than pay Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst an insane amount of money, the studio decided it would be cheaper to hire new actors and start over. Expect this sort of thing with every franchise from now on. I would not be surprised one bit if Iron Man is rebooted within the next 10 years. We know that WB is planning to reboot Batman since Christian Bale is getting older and too expensive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
04:44 PM on 02/07/2012
Bale's not too old (he's almost 10 years younger than Robert Downey Jr!). He's just not interested in doing a fourth Batman. Neither is Nolan.

I have no doubt that the studio will continue the Batman franchise without them, most likely in the form of a reboot. I'd like to see them do a movie based on Batman Beyond. Bring in Clint Eastwood to play Bruce Wayne and Joseph Gordon-Levitt to play Terry/Batman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Film Shark
I love cinema.
06:29 AM on 02/07/2012
Bring back Tobey Maguire. He was the best Spider-Man.
photo
trweste144
never one for moderation...
10:15 AM on 02/07/2012
You haven't even seen the new one so how could you compare?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
auramac
12:54 PM on 02/07/2012
I have no opinion on the new one and won't till I see it- regardless of all the promos and speculation.
01:53 AM on 02/07/2012
I loved 2 of the 3 Spiderman movies. This movie I am dubious of but the actor is quite attractive. There are lots of Spider-Man stories to tell. I'm not convinced that a prequel is the most compelling route to have gone here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexias Lazar
Be Excellent to Each Other!
01:26 AM on 02/07/2012
With the Lizard being basically a green monster, I hope this movie sets the science up so that in the next, the Green Goblin will be more of a threat than the power ranger suited clown from the first Spiderman, IMHO a lackluster villain.
11:41 AM on 02/07/2012
+1. Those three movies were atrocious!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
auramac
12:55 PM on 02/07/2012
And you saw two more after hating the first one? Blame yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig 212
Tide goes in, tide goes out.
04:40 PM on 02/07/2012
I kinda want to see Hobgoblin.
photo
VeggieLove
apparently, my micro-bio is empty
11:55 PM on 02/06/2012
Please, please, please no more sequels, prequels, or any other regurgitated movie bile. With the exception of Christopher Nolan, no one seems to do a good job at reinventing a franchise or character. Original ideas please!
07:32 PM on 02/06/2012
So, where is the current footage that got me to this page?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greenbug14
I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it.
12:02 AM on 02/07/2012
I suppose we were to go find it. Here it is : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siqo1X-gKTk

Campbell Scott, Sally Field & Martin Sheen too.
Greenblue
Whatever doesn't kill you, makes you stranger :P
02:11 AM on 02/07/2012
OMG that kitteh! Is it yours?:)))