Mike Kaplan

GET UPDATES FROM Mike Kaplan
 

Inside the First Screening of A Clockwork Orange

Posted: 01/30/2012 9:45 am

"I think it's my most... skillful film," Stanley Kubrick stated in his calm, equanimous voice, the day after screening the first assembly of A Clockwork Orange.

We were standing on either side of Stanley's desk in his functionally chaotic home office at Abbots Mead in Elstree, England, going over the agenda for our imminent meeting with Dick Lederer, senior vice president of advertising-publicity at Warner Bros.

Stanley always spoke precisely, especially on matters of great importance, and he had to have contemplated all available adjectives before deciding on "skillful" to contextualize Clockwork within his body of work. It was a word I'd never heard him use before.

The highest echelon of Warner executives, headed by chairman Ted Ashley, had flown in from Burbank for the event, their first look at any frame of Kubrick's latest film. Overwhelmed at what they saw, they conveyed their enthusiasm in a euphoric meeting immediately following the screening.

After they left, Stanley kept Jan Harlan, his brother-in-law and executive producer, and myself, his head of marketing (though "marketing" was a word yet to be adapted into industry parlance) in the wood-paneled conference room at Pinewood Studios (where Clockwork had been screened) and grilled us for two and a half hours, extracting our response and opinion about every scene and detail in the film. It was both exhausting and exhilarating -- an unscheduled and unexpected display of his trust in our honesty... and loyalty.

I had offered Kubrick my uncensored opinion of one of his films on a previous occasion, in 1968, when I was an executive at MGM charged with spearheading an alternative marketing campaign for 2001: A Space Odyssey. The film's premiere was panned by critics, so under enormous corporate pressure -- and having not seen 2001 with an audience prior to its opening -- Stanley cut 19 minutes from its length in five days. I told him then, with certainty, that "for those who got 2001, the 19 minutes were a bonus; for those who didn't, the cuts wouldn't matter." (The 19 minutes were recently "rediscovered" in a Midwest storage vault). The cuts didn't affect the critical response.

But this was different. I was being formally interrogated about a film that was still unfinished. Stanley, however, insisted on immediate feedback, and my hesitation evaporated -- for we never hedged. With Stanley, hedging was a waste of valuable time.

For two months after my arrival in England, in May 1971, I had been carrying on an unusual relationship with the footage that would come to constitute A Clockwork Orange. Between our daily pattern of lunch and evening work sessions, Stanley wanted me to choose the stills that would be necessary for publicity. Movie promotional images were always produced by unit or special photographers on the set who photographed what they saw. Stanley held, correctly, that these traditional film stills weren't an accurate representation of what was on screen and he prevailed with the studio in the unprecedented process of taking the images directly from the film. (Stanley, who had begun his career as a photographer for Look magazine, always had strong opinions about the medium.)

Later, these frame stills served another purpose in the screenplay edition of Clockwork, as Stanley used them to depict every editing cut.

So each day, for three to five hours, I would sit in front of a Moviola -- the hand-fed editing machine through which all the printed film passed -- watching every scene from every angle as assistant editor Gary Shepherd loaded the takes, removing the frames I marked with a chalk pencil and placing them in slide holders to be culled later. The work was complicated and time-consuming. Later, the color frames had to be converted to Stanley's high standards for black-and-white stills, for newspaper reproduction.

2012-01-30-IMG1.jpg


2012-01-30-IMG2.jpg


2012-01-30-IMG_3.jpg


But though I had seen every take of the film, I was largely in the dark, for Stanley insisted I watch without sound, responding purely to the visuals.

The only time I violated his directive was after a week of hearing a buoyant Malcolm McDowell singing slices of "Singin' in the Rain" from the editing room below my office. It finally became too frustrating -- I had to know how the song was used (it wasn't in the script, which I wasn't allowed to read anyway) and forced the editors to show me the sequence with picture and sound. The scene -- McDowell's prancing rape of Adrienne Corri before an apoplectic Patrick Magee -- was startling in its daring and ingenious in its conception. It confirmed everything I knew from Kubrick's prior movies and from the Anthony Burgess novel upon which the film was adapted - A Clockwork Orange would be another Kubrick revelation.

Settling into the rhythm of Stanley's questioning, Jan and I responded quickly -- which wasn't easy, as the film had twisted our emotions, seducing us into sympathizing with McDowell's uniquely amoral yet dangerously appealing protagonist. Halfway through the conversation, we came to his seduction of "two young devotchicks" in a sped-up ménage a trois timed to the William Tell Overture. The sequence was sexy, funny and inventive -- and the coupling was repeated twice.

I said that it was dazzling but that repeating the bedwork felt like milking the audience, though I didn't know what effect he wanted. Stanley held that the second threesome would still get laughs.

The scene remained intact until six months after the film's X-rated U.S. release, when he removed 11 seconds to secure an "R" rating. Three seconds from the second shagging were eliminated.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:28 PM on 02/09/2012
I saw a restored print of A Clockwork Orange at the Santa Barbara Film Festival last week - "Oh bliss! Bliss and heaven!"

http://www.noozhawk.com/article/020712_jeff_moehlis_a_music_fan_goes_to_sbiff/
09:49 PM on 02/08/2012
How special to have been part of such masterworks. Thank you for sharing your insights and memories. My appreciation for Kubrick's works has been deepened.
01:38 AM on 02/05/2012
It was brilliant to have been able to read this. Thank you!
filmacher
Hating republicans since 1994.
09:04 PM on 02/04/2012
Who would've though the Ludovico technique would end up being the guiding philosophy of Fox News.
08:01 AM on 02/01/2012
Kubrick's last masterpiece. The next 25 years were extremely disappointing. Clockwork however remains a unique work from a great era of filmmaking.
01:01 AM on 01/31/2012
And even with the X rating it was still nominated for Best Picture.
08:12 PM on 01/30/2012
if you loved kubrick's work, you will love this stuff

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheCalzoneSpaceship?feature=mhee
06:22 PM on 01/30/2012
The book was superior to the movie.
08:56 AM on 01/31/2012
Far superior
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:08 PM on 01/31/2012
No it wasn't.
12:06 AM on 02/01/2012
Then the book went way over your head. Literature can do that.

The movie was only a cartoon, striking but superficial.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mburgh
Come Back Samuel Gompers
01:19 PM on 01/30/2012
Any chance you can tell us what is on those missing 19 minutes of 2001? Any chance they'll be restored? Great story about two of my favorite films. Thanks for sharing this story.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:09 PM on 01/31/2012
I'm with you.
There are 19 minutes of the greatest film of all time lying in a vault.
Must See NOW!!!
photo
Dirtyrottenliberal
Exposing right wing liars...one at a time
12:02 PM on 02/05/2012
It's basically another docking sequence almost identical to the one in the film.
jhNY
Mercy.
01:14 PM on 01/30/2012
When I saw "Clockwork Orange" the year of its release, I thought it was a wildly pessimistic projection of future dystopia, then a few years later, I saw it again, and I could not get over how prescient it seemed to be. That effect is unique in my lifetime of film-watching.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Baack
Knower of things, speaker of gibberish.
11:55 AM on 01/30/2012
What a fascinating story! Thank you for sharing it. I enjoy the "threesome scene" because it provides a few laughs -- helpful in the midst of this hugely grim (but thoroughly fascinating) film. Besides, it's always fun to spot the "2001" soundtrack album in the record store that Alex is cruising.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Raskin
11:42 AM on 01/30/2012
I can't wait to see the 19 minutes of 2001. I would buy the dvd again just for that.
I never really was a fan of "Clockwork Orange." It seems to me that Kubrick lost his great humanist vision which had been present in his prior films. It seemed more like a cold technical exercise. I think he regained it in Barry Lyndon, but his last three films are just some more clever technical exercises.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:14 PM on 01/31/2012
could not disagree with you more.
Each Kubrick film has layers on layers of meaning.
Some of it is there and some of it we project onto the films ourselves.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/movies/room-237-documentary-with-theories-about-the-shining.html