Jason Apuzzo

GET UPDATES FROM Jason Apuzzo
 

Why The Cold War Is Back at the Movies in The Iron Lady, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy & Mission Impossible

Posted: 01/13/12 06:04 PM ET

The Cold War is back -- at least at the movies.

This weekend moviegoers can watch Meryl Streep portray ardent Cold Warrior Margaret Thatcher in The Iron Lady, Gary Oldman root out a dangerous Soviet mole from the British intelligence service in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, and Tom Cruise race to prevent a Cold War-style nuclear exchange between America and Russia in Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.

These films form part of a major Hollywood trend toward reawakening memories of the Cold War -- an era that is suddenly returning with a vengeance on the big screen, with long-term implications for our popular culture.

Currently in the midst of an awards-season run, for example, Clint Eastwood's J. Edgar tells the story of legendary FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's decades'-long confrontation with Soviet infiltration of America. Also in the midst of an awards-season run is the ominous new documentary Khodorkovsky, which depicts how little Russia's authoritarian governing style has changed since the dark days of the old Soviet Union.

And the trend doesn't stop there. If Santa slipped new Blu-rays of Transformers: Dark of the Moon, X-Men: First Class, Apollo 18 or The Kennedys into your Christmas stocking, you just got another healthy dose of Cold War nostalgia from those films -- because 2011 was a watershed year in Hollywood for reviving America's long-standing rivalry with all things Russian and/or communist.

So, what's going on here? Why is Hollywood suddenly reviving Russian communists, spies and autocrats as the go-to villains of choice?

The simplest answer may be that the old Soviet Union is gradually replacing Nazi Germany, Imperial Rome and space aliens as Hollywood's favorite antagonists. In an industry still hesitant to make films about today's War on Terror, and with memories of World War II fading, Russian authoritarians -- including those of the present day variety -- are on their way to becoming Hollywood's safe, consensus villains of the moment.

This trend began in 2008, with, of all things, an Indiana Jones film. Set in 1957 at the height of the Cold War, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull featured Soviet communists as the villains, and despite grumbling from critics and internet fanboys the film played well in middle America -- taking in over $317 million domestically (a figure even Ghost Protocol seems unlikely to match) and $786 worldwide. Perhaps just as significantly, the fact that the film had been made by Steven Spielberg and George Lucas seemingly gave the green light to other left-of-center filmmakers that depicting Reds as the villains was OK again.

Soon Angelina Jolie was hunting sleeper Soviet agents in Salt (2010), Ed Harris and Colin Farrell were escaping a brutal Soviet gulag in Peter Weir's extraordinary The Way Back (2010), and even Richard Gere and Martin Sheen were getting in on the act -- smoking out a Russian mole in The Double (2011). Released here in the U.S. in 2010, Fred Ward played Ronald Reagan in the French Cold War spy thriller Farewell, and Renny Harlin's action-drama 5 Days of War (2011) depicted the brutality of Russia's recent invasion of Georgia.

To be fair, Russians haven't been the only villains in this trend. MGM's forthcoming remake of Red Dawn (read a review of an early cut of the film here) depicts a communist invasion of America by the North Koreans and Chinese, similar to the invasion of Australia depicted in Stuart Beattie's recent thriller Tomorrow, When the War Began (2010). Bruce Beresford's touching Mao's Last Dancer (2009) recreated in heartbreaking detail the restrictions in Chinese communist society on artists. And perhaps no recent film captured communist tyranny more vividly than Mads Brügger's gonzo documentary from 2009 on North Korea, The Red Chapel.

This movie revival of the Cold War -- in its many Russian, Chinese and North Korean variations -- has intriguing implications. For the past generation, many left-of-center filmmakers have been deeply invested in the notion that the Cold War was a kind of paranoid mirage, a tragicomic figment of Ronald Reagan and Whittaker Chambers' imaginations. With few exceptions, the basic image created by these filmmakers of the Cold War -- codified in films like Dr. Strangelove (1964), or more recently in Good Night, and Good Luck (2005) -- has been one of an artificial conflict fueled by American militarism and bourgeois small-mindedness. The sardonic The Russians Are Coming, the Russians Are Coming (1966) serves as perhaps the sine qua non of this genre.

This vision of the Cold War appears to be changing, however, among younger, less ideologically driven filmmakers. These filmmakers view the Cold War simply as a fertile field of storytelling possibilities about the struggle for freedom, in much the same way an older generation viewed World War II. Filmmakers today seem more eager to tell such stories about the Cold War, unearthing the past and depicting the sharp political divisions between East and West, perhaps because these filmmakers detect a continuity between communist tyrannies of the 20th century and similarly repressive regimes today.

After all, Brezhnev and Mao may be gone -- but an ex-KGB man still runs Russia, and communists still run repressive regimes in China and North Korea. And America's relationship with these nations sometimes seems no better than it was before.

Today's Hollywood seems alive to these realities as never before, as reflected in a slate of new projects in the development pipeline that channel Cold War themes. Along with sequels to Salt, X-Men: First Class, Die Hard (with Die Hard 5 set to take place in Russia), and even Top Gun, work is also underway to re-boot the Jack Ryan franchise with Chris Pine in a new thriller called Moscow. Remakes of famous Cold War properties like Ice Station Zebra, The Man from U.N.C.L.E., and even Colossus: The Forbin Project are also in development -- along with adaptations of the books Londongrad, The Reluctant Communist, and the Red Star comic book.

On TV, HBO and FX are working on competing series about '80s-era Soviet spies in the U.S., and HBO reportedly has another series in development about Cold War spies in Berlin.

As if that were not enough, Gerard Butler and Ed Harris will soon be trying to stop rogue Russian generals and KGB agents from starting World War III in Hunter Killer and Phantom, respectively. Or if your sensibilities run toward the art house, Andrzej Wajda is currently directing a biopic of Polish Solidarity leader Lech Walesa.

Granted, it shouldn't be assumed that these films will express a uniformity of opinion about the Cold War, or about current international tensions. Indeed, several recent films like The Iron Lady, J. Edgar, and X-Men: First Class express a pronounced ambivalence about the Cold Warriors they depict.

Watching The Iron Lady, for example, you would hardly know why the Soviet Red Army newspaper labelled Margaret Thatcher "the Iron Lady" in the first place. The film is weirdly evasive of Thatcher's vital role in ending the Cold War -- barely alluding to it except in brief moments of Thatcher with Reagan and Gorbachev, or attending an event commemorating the end of the Cold War. The Iron Lady seems more concerned with Thatcher's current state of physical fragility than in her momentous alliances with Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II and Lech Walesa in hastening the collapse of the Soviet state.

Still, the fascination that films like The Iron Lady or J. Edgar have with Cold Warriors of the past is obvious. And certainly none of these recent films bothers to romanticize the communist cause. Indeed, the days in Hollywood of dueling Che Guevara biopics (Che, The Motorcycle Diaries) -- or of Katherine Hepburn wearing a frayed Mao jacket to the Oscars -- seem long gone.

The Cold War is back in Hollywood, but this time the idea seems to be to support the winning side.

 

Follow Jason Apuzzo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LibertasFilmMag

 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CroatianCritter
is keeping people honest
09:18 PM on 01/18/2012
Your opinion is interesting but I think there is a different underlying motive. Our current wars against Muslims (At least one ongoing plus multiple activities in others) has never really gotten the approval of the American public. We have been the aggressors and our motivations have been very cloudy. I think the Cold War makes many Americans reminisce about the United States when it was influencing the world much more positively. During the Cold War, the United States dominated a good portion of the world economically, politically and most importantly, culturally. We had a purpose and a point of view that made us proud. Until people like Mitt Romney and others started destroying our version of capitalism in the 1980s with corporate mergers and our sick version of capitalism that can only be called "Reaganism," this country has been on a steady and rapid decline. The empire is on the verge of collapse. I think these movies definitely take us back to a better, more positive time.
03:42 AM on 01/18/2012
Actually, I think Hollywood's Cold War nostalgia is addressing the brinkmanship going on for years between US
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Jude
Veteran of Occupy An Office Chair
11:12 PM on 01/16/2012
I thought Iron Lady was a feminist sequel to Iron Man... Boy did I have the wrong idea!
11:29 PM on 01/16/2012
... or it could've been the title to a Gina Carano movie. Just sayin'.

- Jason Apuzzo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Lewis
08:41 PM on 01/16/2012
Nothing like serial rehashings of pitted uber-nationalisms to keep calm in check..

Oh well, though the themes be the same, now the players can be different; now, instead of those dark shrouded figures in hoods standing in the shadows behind the world's thrones being the minions of religions, they can now be the lobbyists of corporations.

America, I don't have a salute for the insincere left in me.
11:51 PM on 01/16/2012
"Serial rehashings of pitted uber-natio­nalisms" might be a great way to describe World Cup soccer, but it's not really what we're discussing here.

- Jason Apuzzo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Lewis
01:36 AM on 01/17/2012
Sorry to you and all the non-blinkers over at the John Birch Society for not singing like Souza at your efforts.

I find what you are really discussing here a bit sticky, intellectually, as are most efforts using as metaphor over-ripe patriotic nostalgia.

I am reminded of a book written back in the sixties which was entitled, I believe, "Military Justice is to Justice as Military Music is to Music."

Rather than the old cold relic of Russia, the real enemy threatening your efforts is triteness.

I find in your genre examinations a failure to mention the films that are looking at our nation's new enemy--corporatism and its intrusions, which is the elephant in the room in many films by Clooney, Damon and others. I find Clooney much more relevant that the wheedled posturings of John Wayne and Harrison Ford.

If we are chewing metaphorically on the bones of Russia and their former threats, we are not looking at the current enemy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gail Cerridwen
08:15 AM on 01/16/2012
i don't even keep up with film trends but I had noticed this one. Ah, nostalgia for those "good old days" of the fifties when there were only clear "good guys" and "bad guys"? But really? For the US, it's all pretty much the same war: proving our "superiority" in the field of destruction so we can feel good about ourselves.
11:24 PM on 01/16/2012
Our 'superiority in the field of destruction' has prevented a lot of wars, as it turns out.

- Jason Apuzzo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Lewis
01:42 AM on 01/17/2012
We had a school yard bully in grade school. His 'superiority in the field of destruction' probably prevented a lot of fights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gail Cerridwen
02:18 AM on 01/17/2012
Are you aware how many unnecessary wars we've been responsible for? (No, that side of things not covered in school textbooks, strangely enough... And I do think we've been as a nation largely in the field of denial and delusion of late?)
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:36 PM on 01/15/2012
Despite the Cold War's end, weapons manufacturing continued and the US expanded NATO to Russia's borders (which may explain why the Russian people accepted an authoritarian ex-KGB member as their president). Now that the US and China are vying for control of the South China Sea, while the US and Iran vie for influence in the Middle East, it's as if the Cold War is returning. A recent HP article noted that the Russia-Georgia War was due in part to construction of a pipeline from Central Asia to the Black Sea (as well as Georgia's continued occupation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia).

Let's think about Europe after WWII. The US and USSR each agreed to control different parts of the continent (how arrogant can you get?). The people of Eastern Europe may have welcomed the Soviet army as liberators at first, but the liberators overstayed their welcome mat. Therefore, the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe should have served as a warning to American plans to occupy Iraq.

Personally, a movie that I'd like to see -- understanding that it's fictional -- is one in which the American and Soviet governments agree to have the Cold War just so that each government has an excuse to scare its citizens and spend all its resources on weapons.
11:35 PM on 01/16/2012
So we're to blame for Putin? Are we also to blame for clunky Lada cars and gooey Russian chocolate?

- Jason Apuzzo
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
12:27 AM on 01/17/2012
In a way, we are to blame for Putin.
09:39 PM on 01/14/2012
Jason,

Thank you for your article. Khordovsky sounds excitingly new, like the still-new Russia.

Among the films, you cited only Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy seems re-create a sense of the Cold War. (The Thatcher movie shows only the tail end of it.) Tinker also stands out for achieving at times nearly as much and at times even more than the 6-hour British TV series.

I see that you lump my grandfather, Whittaker Chambers, among others with a paranoid image of the Cold War. Then again, ever since Whittaker Chambers' death in 1961, William F. Buckley, Jr., conservatives, and neo-conservatives have done their best to recast this anti-communist as a Cold Warrior. There was and remains a great difference.

By now, these people feel they know all all there is to know about Whittaker Chambers. The fact is, they know only what they want to know. An excellent example of this is a recent "intellectual biography" of Whittaker Chambers -- in fact, a narrow focus on a single phase of his life. There is far more to consider -- though nothing fresh or new on the public horizon at present.

Respectfully - David Chambers | http://www.whittakerchambers.org/
10:04 PM on 01/16/2012
David,

Thank you for your letter. Your grandfather left an extraordinary legacy, in particular in writing "Witness," and it's interesting to hear your perspective. However, I just wanted to point out to you that what Jason actually said in his article was:

"For the past generation, many left-of-center filmmakers have been deeply invested in the notion that the Cold War was a kind of paranoid mirage, a tragicomic figment of Ronald Reagan and Whittaker Chambers' imaginations."

Jason wasn't calling Whittaker Chambers paranoid - he was saying that this is how left-of-center filmmakers have tried to portray Chambers.

In any case, I will be sure to check out your website and look forward to reading more about your grandfather.

Best, Govindini Murty, HuffPost blogger & Co-Editor, Libertas Film Magazine

http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com
09:56 PM on 01/17/2012
Govindini,

I stand happily corrected, all the more pleasantly thanks to your kind note.

Portrayals of Whittaker Chambers by filmmakers, writers, and others on either side of center (wherever that is) seem heavily invested in long-set notions -- but we of the next generation have now started the process of chipping away at that facade.

- David Chambers | http://www­.whittaker­chambers.o­rg/
11:45 PM on 01/16/2012
David -

In no way did I intend to characterize your grandfather as a "paranoid," and I'm very sorry if that's the impression you had from the article. I was referring to how he and others are viewed by many left-of-center filmmakers. Personally I do not share that view in any way whatsoever. In fact, I'm very much an admirer of your grandfather, and have read and enjoyed "Witness"; indeed, it's something of a touchstone book for me in terms of understanding the anti-communist cause and the culture of the 1950s.

With that said, I'm aware that there were significant differences between Chambers and the conservatives (and Cold Warriors) of his era. Within the brief space of this article, however, I wasn't really able to go into such issues. In any case, I'm honored that you would write in, and feel free to visit my site when you have the opportunity:

http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/

- Jason Apuzzo
03:03 PM on 01/14/2012
Great article, Jason. Speaking of Whittaker Chambers, here is one such historical project that takes a fresh look at that era:

http://www.whittakerchambersfilm.com

As you note, there is a new wave of filmmakers representing a fresh voice that takes the Cold War era seriously, and we see ourselves at the center with this important story that needs to be told.
11:46 PM on 01/16/2012
Thanks very much for your comments, and best wishes for your film.

- Jason Apuzzo