'John Carter' Box Office Tracking: $25 Million Opening In The Cards For Big-Budget Film?

First Posted: 03/07/2012 6:24 pm Updated: 03/07/2012 6:24 pm

"I don't check any of that stuff," director Andrew Stanton told Moviefone when confronted with the poor box-office tracking for "John Carter," his upcoming sci-fi film. "I learned a long time ago that all I can do is make it worth your while once you're sitting in the theater." About that: according to THR, "John Carter" is actually on course to do worse than expected. Its opening weekend grosses could hit just $25 million, despite the fact that the film is in 3D.

Back in February, it was reported that "John Carter" was headed for possible box-office disaster. Deadline.com quoted one studio executive as saying, "This could be the biggest write-off of all time." The Disney film cost a reported $250 million, a figure that star Taylor Kitsch has downplayed.

"Yeah, that's how I pick my movies. It has to be $300 million or $250 million," Kitsch sarcastically said to Moviefone when asked about the budgets for "John Carter" and "Battleship," which also cost north of $200 million. "That's how I pick my films. Don't tell me about the characters, the other actors, the script, the director or anything. Just the budget."

While final tracking numbers don't come out until Thursday, speculation is that "John Carter" could finish behind the second weekend of "The Lorax."

Of course, there is some hope: "John Carter" is expected to do well overseas, where 3D films generally clean-up at the box office. If the film does well internationally, its possibly disappointing domestic receipts will be much easier to swallow.

Check back to Moviefone on Sunday for the full "John Carter" box office report.

[via THR]

FOLLOW MOVIEFONE

'FONE FINDS
Filed by Christopher Rosen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRidOfWires
Science is not a liberal conspiracy.
03:26 PM on 03/11/2012
I saw it in 3D with the family Friday night. We all liked it. A little Flash Gordon, a little Avatar, but better than both in my opinion. The theater was not packed but was pretty full. I don't get all the hate from the critics.
01:13 AM on 03/11/2012
SEEN JOHN CARTER 2X TO PACKED CHEERING THEATRES!

VERY HAPPY TO SEE THE MOVIE-GOERS ARE PROVING THE NAY-SAYERS WRONG.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sherwoodforest
Seeing the forest for the trees
08:18 PM on 03/10/2012
I loved John Carter!
Sorry to hear the projections- but that has nothing to do with the fact that this is a good film!
Hope people see it anyway- it is a fun ride!
I thought film worked on many levels as an adventure film that the whole family can enjoy. It is beautifully shot and a very well told story- so no surprise Andrew Stanton of Pixar is involved. I think critics are a sorry lot- they should understand when to just let themselves enjoy it. Poor A.O. Scott in NYT practically twisting in pain NOT to say how much fun he had- pathetic review and he did not even know the books. Some one needs to review the reviewers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
05:42 PM on 03/09/2012
Spouse and I are going to see it 3D in a couple of hours; it'll be the 1st time we've been to a 3D movie together. I've been looking forward to this movie for a long time and have over the years wondered why the novella never made it to to screen--I've been a fan of John Carter stories since I first read them in junior high.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Carmichael
02:59 PM on 03/09/2012
Looks better than Avatar did. Don't understand the backlash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vincentmerkel
demons run when a good man goes to war
08:55 PM on 03/09/2012
yes and written 100 years before
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
11:53 PM on 03/09/2012
Correct. Avatar would not exist without the Burroughs' Mars series. A great deal of sci-fi written later would not exist, come to that.

Burroughs wasn't too great with "science" but his adventure fiction, whether in the jungles of an Africa he mostly made up in the early years, on Barsoom, at the Earths core or "Beyond the Farthest Star" remain greatly enjoyable reading today.
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
01:48 PM on 03/08/2012
The first mistake the studio made was giving this film a terrible title.

John Carter?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
05:46 PM on 03/09/2012
I read somewhere that they were afraid "John Carter of Mars" would have been worse, and I suppose the studio thought "John Carter: A Princess of Mars" would have been even riskier . . . especially for Disney.
01:26 AM on 03/11/2012
"WARLORD OF MARS" MUST HAVE MADE THEM CRINGE...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vincentmerkel
demons run when a good man goes to war
08:53 PM on 03/09/2012
First it was made for fans of the story by Burroughs......so the second I saw John Carter I knew what was comeing...I read these storys as a boy over 40 years ago ...I turned my sons and my grandson onto to them ........so maybe if you read Edgar Rice Burroughs ......who wrote many great storys including Tarzan ...... you would see that is a great title...so maybe if you read some classics by Burroughs, Wells, Verne , Heinlein some of the great authors of our time ...you might have a better understanding
08:09 PM on 03/07/2012
Well I don't know what it is about this movie...but it does not look or sound remotely interesting to me. I was shocked to hear Andrew Stanton did this movie because he made WALL-E and Finding Nemo....2 AMAZING MOVIES! I won't be seeing John Carter in the theater.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
05:49 PM on 03/09/2012
One has to be an Edgar Rice Burroughs fan, I think, and realize that this particular story is an 100 years old.
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
11:54 PM on 03/09/2012
You're missing what promises to be a fun and exciting movie.
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
06:15 PM on 03/10/2012
As I thought, the movie was excellent.

Saw it regular. Might even be willing to shell out the extra bucks to see it again in 3D...and generally, I don't like 3D that much. This was not made in the "in your face" 3D mode.