George Lucas On 'Star Wars': 'When I Make The Slightest Change, Everybody Thinks It's The End Of The World'

George Lucas

First Posted: 02/ 9/2012 7:04 pm Updated: 02/ 9/2012 7:04 pm

George Lucas knows you "Star Wars" fans are pissed at him. You don't need to remind him. However, that won't stop the director from defending the infamous changes he's made to the original trilogy.

"Changes are not unusual -- I mean, most movies when they release them they make changes. But somehow, when I make the slightest change, everybody thinks it's the end of the world," Lucas told the Hollywood Reporter.

Lucas, who's been doing interviews of late to promote both "Red Tails" and "The Phantom Menace 3D," even took the time to address one of the biggest "Star Wars" controversies ever: The Han-Shot-First dilemma.

In "Star Wars - Episode IV: A New Hope," the audience is introduced to Han Solo at the Mos Eisley Cantina, where he runs into a bounty hunter named Greedo. The original version showed Han shooting first, but in the 1997 re-release, Lucas changed the scene to show that Greedo was the one who shot first (which made Han seem like much less of a rogue). Despite the uproar, George still stands by the decision.

"The controversy over who shot first, Greedo or Han Solo, in 'Episode IV,' what I did was try to clean up the confusion, but obviously it upset people because they wanted Solo [who seemed to be the one who shot first in the original] to be a cold-blooded killer, but he actually isn't. It had been done in all close-ups and it was confusing about who did what to whom. I put a little wider shot in there that made it clear that Greedo is the one who shot first, but everyone wanted to think that Han shot first, because they wanted to think that he actually just gunned him down."


Lucas' defense will likely do little to dissuade "Star Wars" fanatics who have it out for the filmmaker. In fact, George's next quote will probably enrage them further:

"If you look at 'Blade Runner,' it's been cut sixteen ways from Sunday and there are all kinds of different versions of it. 'Star Wars,' there's basically one version -- it just keeps getting improved a little bit as we move forward."

Lucas goes on to discuss the changes he made to Yoda in "The Phantom Menace," along with his thoughts on "Hugo" and SOPA. You can read the entire interview over on THR.

If you're interested in reliving the "Episode 1" experience (or, for some, inflicting pain on yourselves), you can check out "The Phantom Menace 3D" in theaters this weekend.

[via THR]

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW MOVIEFONE

'FONE FINDS
George Lucas knows you "Star Wars" fans are pissed at him. You don't need to remind him. However, that won't stop the director from defending the infamous changes he's made to the original trilogy. ...
George Lucas knows you "Star Wars" fans are pissed at him. You don't need to remind him. However, that won't stop the director from defending the infamous changes he's made to the original trilogy. ...
Filed by Alex Suskind  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 384
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deckercat
change the world
04:03 PM on 02/13/2012
it's his baby in there with the bathwater
photo
Allosaur2010
Rubio: Castro's Sleeper Agent!
12:38 PM on 02/13/2012
As I've said before, Lucas can make all the dumb changes he wants...it only allows other directors to surpass him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IbrahimSapien
Admit it, chicken nuggets are awesome.
06:39 PM on 02/12/2012
He has ownership of the movie itself, and fans have ownership of their experience with the movie. Nobody question his right to ruin the movie, but fans have the right to express their disdain at being ill-served by a product they've paid for many times over. It's annoying when defenders point out his "right" to change the film. Nobody questions his right.

And many fans agree that his changes, and the "prequels" trilogy as a whole, sucked. I didn't mind the Solo thing, but I think having Darthy moan "noooo" a few extra times while Luke got the Gitmo treatment from Sedious lessened the poignancy of that scene. Aside from that, the prequels never met the quality of storytelling that the original trilogy did. Yoda turned annoying. Apparently the word "contrived" has no meaning in that Galaxy far away, as is evidenced by Boba Fett having such a central role, Darth Vader being the father of C3PO, Chewbacca, etc. Worst of all is learning the dark cool character that was Darth Vader spent his completely-human years as a whiny moody annoying brat.
05:53 PM on 02/12/2012
I'll keep supporting the changes. If Lucas wants it changed he has the right to change it and I'm not going to complain. Fans have the option to watch older versions if they desire.
04:33 PM on 02/12/2012
He's one of the many director producers that bagged the two Coreys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
polson
04:24 PM on 02/12/2012
Every little tweak and re-re-re-release just means more money in Lucas' pocket. Millions of dollars would be raked in by a Director's Cut in which Han Solo's hair is parted on the right side instead of the left. Or is it the other way around? A final version is probably needed to settle that.
Lucas should probably just re-name the entire saga "$tar War$."
04:23 PM on 02/12/2012
Galaxy Quest by far exceeds the Star Wars films. GQ has better character development, realistic Universe travel and universe shots. Good depth and better story line development. As a technical person, QG has a more realistic space vehicles. Can be watched more than once. Wish GQ had sequels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mheister
Raconteur. Blog michaelheister.com
03:55 AM on 02/14/2012
Galaxy Quest came years after Star Wars, and was based on Star Trek. If I recall correctly, the original writer actually wanted the cast of the original Star Trek.

That being said, GQ rocks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Commenter-X
04:04 PM on 02/12/2012
"...Star Wars,' there's basically one version -- it just keeps getting improved a little bit as we move forward." -George Lucas

Wait a minute... What do you mean by IMPROVED? Every time he puts his hands on it, he screws it up a bit more. That's not an opinion, that's fact.

I don't mind he keeps messing with his film until is a total unrecognizable piece of garbage, as long as he also releases the original versions. If he wants to compare it with Blade Runner, well, all those kazillion versions of Blade Runner are all easily accessible to the public for comparison.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the81kid
03:32 PM on 02/12/2012
It's his creation, he can do what he likes with it. But if you don't respect your fans, what are you?

And the Star Wars prequels are really poor films, just considered as individual films - not even in comparison to the originals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
richodg5
03:22 PM on 02/12/2012
Why fis it , if it isn't broke
03:13 PM on 02/12/2012
Star Wars was magnificent in that it concealed that George Lucas is a terrible writer... and he just keeps chipping away at that wonderful quality with each and every change.
03:43 PM on 02/12/2012
It was Lucas's wife, Marcia (who won an academy award for her editing), who saved the Star Wars film from sitting on the cutting room floor. She worked magic from Lucas's rather mediocre directing endeavor. is magic was at Industrial Light & Magic, the special effects facility that gave us all those great scenes in the original trilogy.
05:24 PM on 02/12/2012
Yes, and also the genius of Gary Kurtz. Lucas as the sole owner and lord of the franchise has been taken for the sole creative genius of the first two films (Star Wars and Empire Strikes back). The genius of Marcia, Gary, and Lucas' mentor and facilitator, Francis Ford Coppola, has been lost. A pity. More info: http://goo.gl/BgbP6
03:09 PM on 02/12/2012
Lucas needs to go look at that episode in Firefly where Malcom Reynolds throws a bound man into a jet intake port after he threatens to hunt Reynolds down and kill him. Refreshingly direct way of dealing with homicidal antagonists.
photo
Allosaur2010
Rubio: Castro's Sleeper Agent!
12:30 PM on 02/13/2012
And that's just one of the millions of things Lucas could learn from Whedon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mheister
Raconteur. Blog michaelheister.com
03:56 AM on 02/14/2012
Fox TV had gold on their hands, and they turned it into straw. And fed it to mules.
03:05 PM on 02/12/2012
Here is an interview with Gary Kurtz worth reading. It confirms something I felt even as a kid: From the public perspective it seems George Lucas is the sole creative force of his brainchild "Star Wars", but filmmaking reality usually is that one or more other invisibles are shapers of the body and soul of the collaborative product. And in fact, here it was George, his publically underappreciated editor wife Marcia, quite significantly his friend and producer Gary Kurtz, and later Irvin Kershner (taking the seat warmed by George's mentor and significant FACILITATOR Francis Ford Coppola) -- the "Beatles" foursome that made Star Wars and Empire Strikes Back work so well.

But like the Beattles, what was creative gold was interpersonal hell. They didn't get along. The collaborators completely disbanded after Empire Strikes Back, George and Marcia divorced soon thereafter, and ever since then George has been running large as the sole owner and lord of his gazillion dollar franchise, surrounded by talented but totally subordinate managers and creatives. The result? Ewoks.

And all the rest of that undead Star Wars crapola ever since. From Coppola to Crapola. Shame, like the Beattles, they had a good thing going. Well, for art anyway, not for their collective mental health I guess.

OH, I almost forgot. Here is that Film Threat interview with Gary Kurtz:
http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=interviews&Id=8
03:45 PM on 02/12/2012
Perfect take on "The Empire."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VirginiaJeff
Waiting for the "Jennifer Government" movie
02:54 PM on 02/12/2012
I love you, George. But the changes don't work. I'm pretty sure you're in the habit of screening new movies  for test audiences, and making changes based on their reactions. Well, we became the test audience for your revisions, and we didn't like them. So give us back the version we liked.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brett Tonaille
Author and translator
02:51 PM on 02/12/2012
Personally, I've always loved that scene, since it set up what a thoroughly lawless world Solo came from.
But seriously - people are getting UPSET about this?
Lucas has already won big time when people take a fictional world this seriously.