Matt Damon VS Tom Cruise: Who's The Biggest Superstar

First Posted: 12/28/11 06:58 PM ET   Updated: 01/10/12 11:16 AM ET

"Are Tom Cruise and Matt Damon starting to switch places?" reads the headline on the Los Angeles Times blog 24 Frames. Following the disappointing returns for the opening weekend of 'We Bought a Zoo' and the surprisingly muscular box-office for 'Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol,' Steven Zeitchik posits that Cruise has usurped Damon on the A-list -- a surprise, considering Cruise was fast becoming a box-office pariah four years ago. Good question -- especially for a slow news week -- but doesn't it seem a bit premature? After all, was Matt Damon ever really a box-office draw?

Consider these facts: Damon's biggest financial hits, in chronological order, have been 'Good Will Hunting' ($138M), 'Saving Private Ryan' ($216M), 'Ocean's Eleven' ($183M), 'The Bourne Identity' ($121M), 'The Bourne Supremacy' ($176.2M), 'Ocean's Twelve' ($125M), 'The Departed' ($132M), 'Ocean's Thirteen' ($117M), 'The Bourne Ultimatum' ($227M) and 'True Grit' ($171M).

With the exception of 'Good Will Hunting,' you could make the argument that Damon wasn't instrumental in any of those films becoming successes. He's the third lead in the 'Ocean's' franchise behind Brad Pitt and George Clooney; he doesn't factor in 'Saving Private Ryan' until the third act, despite being the titular private; 'The Departed' and 'True Grit' are ensembles that don't necessarily reflect Damon's singular star power. Only 'Bourne' stands as a testament to his solo box-office bona fides, and even that could be questioned. After all, did Damon make 'Bourne' or did 'Bourne' make Damon? (This question will get answered next August, when 'The Bourne Legacy' with Jeremy Renner arrives in theaters, sans Damon.)

This is not to say Damon isn't (A) one of the best and most likable actors of his generation and (B) a "movie star." For one thing, he stars in movies (duh, but still); for another, films like 'The Informant!' ($33M), 'The Adjustment Bureau' ($62M), 'The Good Shepherd' ($59M) and 'The Talented Mr. Ripley' ($81M) would have never done as well as they did without Damon's face on the poster. It's just that comparing Damon and Cruise seems specious at best -- especially when even Cruise's recent "bombs," 'Knight and Day' and 'Valkyrie,' earned over $200 million worldwide.

Think of it this way: if 'We Bought a Zoo' had starred Tom Cruise, would it have grossed more than the $13 million the film earned with Damon at the helm over Christmas weekend? (Put another way: is it any wonder that Tom Cruise is behind Cameron Crowe's biggest box-office hits?)

So, no: Tom Cruise and Matt Damon are not "starting to switch places." They never switched to begin with.

PHOTOS:

"We Bought A Zoo" Premiere - After Party
1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
NEW YORK, NY - DECEMBER 12: Film subject Benjamin Mee (L) and actor Matt Damon attend the after party for the 'We Bought a Zoo' premiere at The Royalton Hotel on December 12, 2011 in New York City. (Photo by Michael Loccisano/Getty Images)
RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW

FOLLOW MOVIEFONE

"Are Tom Cruise and Matt Damon starting to switch places?" reads the headline on the Los Angeles Times blog 24 Frames. Following the disappointing returns for the opening weekend of 'We Bought a Zoo' ...
"Are Tom Cruise and Matt Damon starting to switch places?" reads the headline on the Los Angeles Times blog 24 Frames. Following the disappointing returns for the opening weekend of 'We Bought a Zoo' ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Francois Bergeron
seeking sense
03:48 AM on 01/17/2012
What is the use of this article?
12:12 AM on 01/16/2012
Funny, I was just thinking of how its a requirement for Scientologists to patronize his movies. Matt Damon is still the better actor. And why post what Matt Damon did in his movies domestically what Tom Cruise did internationally?
12:53 AM on 01/23/2012
Yeah what a flawed article. You've only supplied your reader with facts that support your opinion and leave out the ones that don't. Giving the reader domestic totals for Matt and international total for Tom is a pretty huge error.

I don't think Matt is a bigger star than Tom, but your article doesn't prove that at all. Cruise was a great actor, not as much anymore, same with Damon.

They both had their primes earlier in their career, recently they've both only made sub par films, which means both of their stars are fading.

Also, just because Cruise's films have made more money, doesn't mean he's a better actor, another large error in your article.