Heather Timmons went to England to visit the set of Flight 93, director Paul Greengrass' treatment of the goings on aboard the one 9/11 plane that didn't hit the hijacker's target. Unlike the more "Hollywoodized" World Trade Center that Oliver Stone is shooting with Nicolas Cage in Los Angeles, Greengrass is making a concerted effort to shape 93 around empirical data, from cockpit recordings and data regarding the plane's actual movements through the air, to character sketches provided by the victims' families. Many of film's actors have studied videotapes of the passengers they portray, with the families cooperating in the interest of telling a broader version of the story than the "Let's roll" narrative that has dominated its telling. It seems like Greengrass is very much going for an almost scientifically indisputable account of the flight, even though, as he admits to Timmons, "One of the reasons why Flight 93 exerts such a powerful hold on our imaginations is precisely because we don't know exactly what happened." It's not hard to see what kind of burden the film carries, as the first feature to attempt to dramatize the events to hit theaters. Greengrass' investment in by-the-numbers recreation is, in a way, a statement of ideology – or, rather, a clear declaration of intent to sidestep it. For, as NYU professor Marita Stucken tells Timmons, ""There is a pretty big audience for that story, if - and this is crucial - if people perceive it to be sensitively told."